Sandbox Game Design In Past, Present, And Future

I've been a fan of sandbox gameplay probably since before the term was even coined.

By Degtyarev, Posted 06 Mar 2011

I've been a fan of sandbox gameplay probably since before the term was even coined. The problem here was that 3D sandbox games didn't even exist back then - at least, I didn't know of their existence. What I would usually do, was play a game such as Super Mario 64 or The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, but instead of following the main quest line, I would just wander around rather aimlessly, occasionally stumbling across secrets.

Why I did this, I don't really know. I probably prefered being immersed by the open 3D worlds by just exploring them, rather than being forced down the more linear paths of quest-solving, even though the latter was essentially the point of these games. Wherever it came from, my unconventional behaviour was often a source of irritation for my gaming buddies. My cousin, for example, refused to fire up Ocarina of Time if all I was gonna do was to 'meander'. Little did either of us know that whole games would soon be designed around this playing style. I really was far ahead of my time.

Sandbox, 3D, Super Mario 64, The Legend of Zelda, Ocarina of Time, GTA, Midtown Madness, Driver, Saints Row, True Crime, Just Cause, Fuel, Burnout Paradise, Far Cry 2, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Cryostasis, ArmA II
GTA 3 was one of the first games to allow us to behave like utter pricks

The first game to truly grant my wishes in this respect was Grand Theft Auto III in 2001. Sure, 3D open world games like Midtown Madness and Driver preceded that title by quite a few years, but GTA3 was the first game I remember playing where the overworld served as more than just a little playground to test vehicles in inbetween races.

Not only did GTA3 send us on missions which could often be completed in various ways, it also provided us with an overworld that was designed to fool around in. With a wide array of weapons, vehicles, side missions and stunt opportunities, GTA3 was the first game I played in which I didn't need an excuse for my sense of exploration: it was the purpose of the game, after all.

Sandbox, 3D, Super Mario 64, The Legend of Zelda, Ocarina of Time, GTA, Midtown Madness, Driver, Saints Row, True Crime, Just Cause, Fuel, Burnout Paradise, Far Cry 2, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Cryostasis, ArmA II
Far Cry 2 definitely wasn't perfect, but it sure as hell made for some awesome combat situations

As much as I liked GTA's transition to three dimensions, I didn't yet put it into a wider perspective. It's true that, in the next few years, tons of other sandbox/open world games would come out. But nearly all of them came across as GTA clones, just like most of the mid-nineties first person shooters were considered Doom clones.

At one point, I even developed a bit of an aversion against sandbox. It was almost as if it had become a trend, and everything suddenly had to feature a huge, explorable overworld, regardless from whether it served some kind of function. There were games like Saints Row and True Crime, which desperately tried to copy GTA without understanding what made the latter such a good game in the first place. Meanwhile, Just Cause put a bit more emphasis on driving and shooting around the overworld rather than completing missions. As a result, that game didn't really seem to know what it wanted to do. As a matter of fact, it seemed like almost noone but Rockstar understood how to make a sandbox game work.

Sandbox, 3D, Super Mario 64, The Legend of Zelda, Ocarina of Time, GTA, Midtown Madness, Driver, Saints Row, True Crime, Just Cause, Fuel, Burnout Paradise, Far Cry 2, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Cryostasis, ArmA II
The sky is the limit in FUEL

Fortunately, it turned out that other developers just needed a bit of time before they finally grasped the concept. This generation in gaming has seen many studios put out amazing sandbox/open world games to a point where I personally think it's hard to claim that Rockstar still is number 1 in sandbox design. If anything, GTA IV (released in 2008), which largely stays true to GTA3 conceptually, shows what a long way we've come since 2001. Suddenly, the franchise started showing its age, with its limitations becoming more apparent than ever due to other games going way beyond the borders of GTA's design.

The main reason for the prevalence of sandbox games this generation is the fact that developers have had some time to adjust to the concept and find ways to implement this structure into other genres. This allows them to focus on doing what they're good at instead of merely trying to cook up subpar attempts at 'crime simulators' à la GTA.

Developers of racing games, for example, finally seemed to understand that offering us a huge overworld with extremely linear races doesn't make for very satisfying sandbox-styled gameplay. The Midnight Club series already seemed to get this, as did the odd Midtown Madness 3, but it wasn't until FUEL and, to a lesser extent, Burnout Paradise (both released in 2009) that navigation really started becoming an integral part of the sandbox racing experience.

Sandbox, 3D, Super Mario 64, The Legend of Zelda, Ocarina of Time, GTA, Midtown Madness, Driver, Saints Row, True Crime, Just Cause, Fuel, Burnout Paradise, Far Cry 2, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Cryostasis, ArmA II
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat is a revolution in video game AI

Even more importantly, this generation saw the definite rise of the sandbox first person shooter, after last-gen titles such as Far Cry, Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath and Battlefield already paved the way by showing us the potential of ambient combat in large, open environments. Crysis expanded upon the formula of Far Cry, its spiritual predecessor, and came up with a near-perfect blend of linear level progression and versatile, dynamic combat with limitless possibilities. Meanwhile, games such as Far Cry 2, the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. trilogy and ArmA II delivered an open world-based experience, with especially the latter two also making great leaps in terms of dynamic AI that is able to use the environmental freedom to its advantage.

A result of the emergence of freedom in video game design is that many games that still follow a more linear path are starting to feel outdated. Linear games will have to do something really special in terms of scripting and storytelling (like Cryostasis) if they want to stay relevant. The reason why Call of Duty campaigns are starting to feel more and more like dumbed down, semi-cinematic shooting galleries is not just the shift of focus to the multiplayer experience, but also the fact that time gained in on the concept of linear FPS design to a point that it is barely excusable unless it offers magnificent gunplay, AI, and/or storytelling, none of which Call of Duty has. While sandbox design may have seemed like an irrelevant gimmick in the early 2000s, it's actually starting to become more of a necessity these days.

Sandbox, 3D, Super Mario 64, The Legend of Zelda, Ocarina of Time, GTA, Midtown Madness, Driver, Saints Row, True Crime, Just Cause, Fuel, Burnout Paradise, Far Cry 2, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Cryostasis, ArmA II
ArmA II provides bucketloads of unscripted fun

I, for one, do not lament these developments at all. Along with the rising popularity of customisation in console games, the fact that sandbox design has reached maturity means that more  and more gamers are being encouraged to create their own experience. Even if some developers decide to mirror this trend by forcing us down even narrower, QTE-laden paths under the banner of a 'cinematic experience' (Heavy Rain says hi), we can now at least resort to video games that give us the option to disregard the limited parameters of linear level design and the prebaked paths to complete quests. And, subconsciously or not, that's something I've wanted ever since I started using Ocarina of Time to just 'meander'.

Jesse Dolman, NoobFeed.

comments powered by Disqus

  • I can understand this. Zelda wasn't a sandbox, though it was open world. Though I avoid GTA games, sandboxes like Burnout Paradise and others rock.


    Posted Mar 07, 2011
  • arma II pisses me off. the game is so poorly coded. it could be the perfect game. with every patch they seem to fix problems while making new ones. the vehicles show no visible recoil anymore... it looks rediculous. that game could be number 1 if they had the money.
    Posted Mar 14, 2011

  • Eastern European games tend to do that. Cryostasis is even worse in this respect. Once I look through that, however, there's just so many things the game does right that I can forgive all of its Eastern European sillyness. But yeah, it is still a rising market, and it'd be interesting to see what happens if they start working with budgets similar to Western studios. I do fear, however, that the small budgets are what force them to be creative, and having more money would simply result in producing more mainstream games.


    Posted Mar 14, 2011

Related Feature

  • 0

    Is Summer Game Fest Replacing E3?

    By MChipmunks, Posted Jun 15, 2023

    ummer is truly a special time of the year when the weather is warmer, the grass is greener, and gaming companies play their best hand from their deck. Specifically, they announce t

NoobFeed

General Information

Platform(s): Xbox One, PS4, Switch, Xbox 360, PS3, PC, WII, 3DS, Vita, Mobile
Publisher(s): NoobFeed
Developer(s): NoobFeed Editors
Genres: Artcile
Themes: Feature, Editorial, Interviews, Opinion Pieces
Release Date: 2009-02-14

View All

Popular Articles